![]() TRACE claims, quotes, and media back to the original context.Look for credible sources, and compare information across sources in order to determine whether there appears to be a consensus. ![]() Sometimes it's less important to know about the source itself and more important to assess its claims. A research study funded by a pharmaceutical company is also suspect.) (For example, a company that sells health food products is not the best source for information about health benefits/risks of consuming coconut oil. Look at what others have said about the source to help with your evaluation. If the creator appears untrustworthy, the source may not be worth your time. Take a minute to identify where this information comes from and to consider the creator's expertise and agenda. By pausing, you give your brain time to process your initial response and to analyze the information more critically. We tend to react quickly and with less thought to things that evoke strong feelings. If you start getting overwhelmed during the other moves, pause and remember your original purpose.Īlso take note if you have a strong reaction to the information you see (e.g., joy, pride, anger). If so, slow down before you share or use that information. If not, you can continue with the next parts of SIFT. SIFT (from Mike Caulfield) stands for:Īsk yourself if you recognize the information source and if you know anything about the website or the claim's reputation. SIFT is a helpful acronym for initially evaluating source credibility. Video: How to Find Better Information Online: Click Restraint This short video from the Stanford History Education Group illustrates the importance of click restraint and why you shouldn’t assume that the first search results are necessarily the most reliable or relevant ones. For example, if many of the sources appear to be highly partisan or emotionally charged, the original source may be about a polarizing issue, or the source itself may be polarizing. Considering the results page as a whole can also give you insight into the source. Doing this will help you avoid “rabbit holes” and misleading information. This helps you to get a fuller picture of the coverage available on that source, as well as to look for sources that don’t come from the original source.įact checkers exercise click restraint: they recognize that some sources may not be the most reliable ones and look for trusted coverage. Instead you scan a search results page, looking at things like the title, source description, and featured sections, before deciding what sources to examine. When you practice click restraint, you don’t immediately click on the first search results. One important part of lateral reading is click restraint. Creative Commons license: Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0)Ĭlick restraint: a regular practice of fact checkers, through which one reviews and analyzes a list of search results before deciding on which links to click Image credit: “ 200 pair telephone cable model of corpus callosum.” By brewbooks. This guide draws largely on research from the Stanford History Education Group and on teaching materials from Mike Caulfield's SIFT approach and his Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers. ![]() Many of those strategies are similar to the broader strategies presented in this guide. University of Toronto Libraries offers helpful tips on spotting such information. Misinformation on COVID-19: There is a lot of misinformation circulating about COVID-19 and the novel coronavirus. On the guide’s other pages (see the navigation menu) we’ll share additional source evaluation strategies and learning resources. On this page we’ll introduce you to several lateral reading strategies and concepts. org), and think more carefully about who is behind the source, what their purpose is, and how trustworthy and credible they are. These strategies will help you look beyond less important surface features of a web source (for example, how professional it looks or if it's a. Lateral reading is used commonly by fact checkers. We'll offer some simple, evidence-based strategies for evaluating the credibility of online sources, as well as reading critically. More specifically, we’ll teach you about “ lateral reading,” the practice of doing a quick initial evaluation of a website by spending little time on the website and more time reading what others say about the source or related issue. At the same time that we can benefit from the open nature of the Internet, it's sometimes hard to decide what online information to trust and to use. ![]() The Internet allows people to create and to share information in ways that once seemed possible only in science fiction.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |